-
What distinguishes b-science.net subscriptions from competing information sources?
-
Some competing information sources involve the generation of patent lists upon entering a search query, which are very time-consuming for R&D decision makers to process.
-
At the other end of the competitive spectrum, consultants prepare tailor-made, condensed information for customers, at a price tag that often only general management can afford as opposed to product development groups that often also make key decisions that drive product success or failure. By closely working for only the general management of a comparably limited number of customers per consultant, consultants tend to lack objectivity.
-
Our subscriptions are unique on one hand because they provide a much more granular yet condensed insight into the patent literature in relation to the specific trade-offs faced by technical decision makers, reaching the level of technical product / process specifications and benchmarking data. Because our subscriptions are purchased by multiple subscribers across America, Europe and Asia, they are more objective than tailored work by consultants and they are priced lower. 2 h of 'author support' included in subscriptions typically cover remaining customer-specific information gaps.
-
Results provided by AI-bots that are not 'supervised' by subject matter experts potentially provide inspirational information, but time-consuming fact-checking is necessary and key facts might be missing. Some crucial information might never become available to AI-bots, such as panel discussions that take place at conferences, which often significantly impact b-science.net subject matter expert's view on the commercial prospects of a new technology.
|